Regulatory sensitivity
Exposure to political, legal, or government-dependent outcomes. Higher means more external intervention risk.
0
Low
- No material regulatory dependency detected
High Risk
Significant rule clarity concerns. Material dispute risk exists.
Elevated rule clarity risk (54/100). Key concerns: No explicit resolution source URL or reference provided. Traders should carefully evaluate the resolution criteria before entering a position.
Independent from the Rule Clarity Score
Regulatory sensitivity
Exposure to political, legal, or government-dependent outcomes. Higher means more external intervention risk.
0
Low
Trading liquidity
Execution quality based on depth, turnover, lifetime volume, and quoted spread. Higher means easier entry and exit.
35
High
Six weighted criteria
Time Clarity
How clearly the resolution deadline and time parameters are defined.
Resolution timeline is explicitly defined with a specific date and time reference.
17/20
Resolution Source
Whether an authoritative, verifiable data source is named.
Resolution source is absent or relies on vague, unverifiable references.
4/20
Outcome Definition
How precisely the YES/NO resolution conditions are specified.
Outcome conditions are precisely defined with explicit YES/NO resolution criteria.
18/20
Evidence Standard
Whether acceptable and excluded evidence types are documented.
Evidence standards are implied by context but not formally defined.
5/15
Edge Case Handling
Coverage of delays, revisions, cancellations, and disputed data.
Basic edge cases may be implied but are not explicitly documented in the rules.
5/15
Post-Trade Risk
Risk of retroactive re-interpretation after the market closes.
Moderate post-trade risk — some resolution criteria could be interpreted differently.
5/10
How this market settles
Resolution status available
Gamma exposes a resolution status for this market (shown below).
Volume
$73.6M
24h Change
-28.9pp
Liquidity
$0
24h Volume
—
End Date
June 23, 2025 at 12:00 PM UTC
Resolution Source
No authoritative source is named for resolving this market. This increases the risk of subjective or disputed resolution outcomes.
Run a semantic analysis of this market's resolution criteria using an LLM. The AI identifies logical contradictions, ambiguous language, and missing definitions that rule-based scoring may miss.
Deterministic score: 54/100 · Risk level: High
0 votes cast
Sign in to add your assessment of this market's resolution risk.
Jeffrey Epstein foul play confirmed in 2025?
Will GameStop acquire eBay?
Will the next UK election be called by March 31?
Will the next UK election be called by June 30?
Will the next UK election be called by December 31?
Description
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Indiana Pacers win the 2024-2025 NBA Championship. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. This market will resolve to “No” if it becomes impossible for this team to become 2024-25 NBA Champion based off the rules of the NBA. The resolution source for this market will be information from the NBA.
Outcomes